Kerala Retains Its Curriculum Despite PM SHRI Scheme MoU, Says Education Minister Sivankutty
Kerala’s General Education Minister, V. Sivankutty, has clarified that signing the PM SHRI schools scheme MoU will not alter the state’s curriculum or academic framework. The statement comes amid confusions that the move might introduce central government syllabi into Kerala’s textbooks.
State Curriculum Remains Intact
Sivankutty emphasized that Kerala possesses a strong and independent curriculum and academic vision. He stated unequivocally that signing the MoU was aimed at securing funds for infrastructure development and raising academic standards, and not at surrendering control of the syllabus to the central government.
PM SHRI MoU: Funding and Development, Not Curriculum Imposition
Kerala signed the PM SHRI MoU primarily to access funds for improving school infrastructure and to enhance academic standards. The scheme’s implementation in the state does not impose any central syllabus, including the National Education Policy (NEP) or vocational classes, on Kerala schools.
Union Minister George Kurian, addressing similar concerns, clarified that Kerala remains free to determine its own school curriculum. “If they do not want the NEP or vocational classes, they are free to go that way. Nothing is being forced upon them,” he said during a press interaction in Thrissur.
This reiterates that the MoU is purely a funding and support mechanism, without any obligation for Kerala to modify its textbooks or teaching methods.
Clarifying Misconceptions About the Scheme
The Kerala government’s position is clear:
- Curriculum Autonomy: The state retains complete control over its school syllabus and academic framework.
- Funding Purpose: The PM SHRI scheme is intended solely for infrastructure improvements and academic enhancement, not curriculum changes.
- No Historical or Political Alteration: Alleged attempts to introduce central figures or communal narratives are unfounded and rejected by the state.
By signing the MoU, Kerala ensures schools can benefit from additional resources while maintaining full control over educational content.
Conclusion: Kerala Maintains Educational Independence
Kerala’s engagement with the PM SHRI scheme demonstrates a balanced approach to school development—leveraging central funding without compromising the state’s educational autonomy. Education Minister Sivankutty’s statements reaffirm that no central syllabus will replace Kerala’s curriculum, and historical education will continue to reflect verified facts.
The controversy underscores the political sensitivities surrounding education, but the government remains firm in its stance: academic standards can be enhanced without altering the state’s core educational values.
Kerala’s example highlights how state autonomy in education can coexist with participation in central schemes for development, ensuring students benefit from improved infrastructure without ideological interference.
