Education Today
NEET PG Result 2025 Cancelled for 22 Candidates: NBEMS Takes Strict Action Over Malpractice
Education Today

NEET PG Result 2025 Cancelled for 22 Candidates: NBEMS Takes Strict Action Over Malpractice

In a significant disciplinary move, the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) has annulled the NEET PG results of 22 candidates over allegations of malpractice spanning multiple exam sessions from 2021 to 2025. The decision highlights the Board’s commitment to upholding the integrity of postgraduate medical examinations in India.

Details of the Annulled Results

According to the official NBEMS notification, the 22 candidates whose results have been cancelled include:

  • 13 candidates from the 2025 NEET PG session
  • 3 candidates from the 2024 session
  • 4 candidates from the 2023 session
  • 1 candidate each from the 2022 and 2021 sessions

This action comes after a thorough review by the NBEMS Examination Ethics Committee, which investigated reported instances of malpractice across multiple examination cycles.

Implications for Candidates

The NBEMS notification clearly stated that producing the cancelled NEET PG scorecards or results for any purpose—including employment, enrolment, registration, or admission to PG courses—shall be considered unlawful. The Board further emphasized that it bears no responsibility for any admissions, job placements, or registrations that may have been attempted using these invalidated results.

The statement reads:
"NBEMS disclaims any responsibility or liability arising from employment, admission, or enrolment based on the NEET PG result cancelled herein above."

This clarification ensures that students, employers, and academic institutions are aware that using these annulled results is legally impermissible.

Notable Disqualifications

Among the 22 candidates, Srusti Bommanahalli Rajanna was disqualified pursuant to the Karnataka High Court’s ruling on Writ Petition No. 5785/2025. The remaining 21 candidates were found guilty of using unfair means, as determined by the NBEMS Ethics Committee.

These decisions highlight the stringent scrutiny applied by the Board and reinforce the message that malpractice in medical examinations will not be tolerated, regardless of the session or circumstances.

NEET PG 2025 Examination Overview

The NEET PG 2025 examination saw participation from over 2.42 lakh candidates across India. Of these, 1,28,116 candidates qualified for admission to MD, MS, and PG Diploma programs. Despite the declaration of results, the counselling schedule for admissions is still pending due to ongoing legal proceedings.

One of the key legal challenges involves a petition demanding the release of complete question papers and answer keys, raising concerns about transparency and fairness in the examination process. These developments have put the NEET PG counselling timeline under scrutiny, potentially delaying admissions for eligible candidates.

Social Media Concerns and Transparency Issues

The annulment of results follows widespread concern among students on social media platforms like X, Telegram, and Reddit, where users questioned how private entities obtained candidate data to offer admissions outside the regular centralised counselling conducted by the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) and NBEMS.

Many students alleged that these entities were soliciting admissions or offering guidance based on private data, bypassing the official admission processes. This situation underscores the importance of safeguarding candidate data and maintaining strict transparency in examination procedures.

The NBEMS’ decision to annul the results of candidates involved in malpractice is a critical step to restore trust in the examination system and discourage any future attempts at unfair means.

Legal and Procedural Context

The disqualification of candidates such as Srusti Bommanahalli Rajanna, as well as the annulment of results for the 21 others, follows a structured investigation by the NBEMS Ethics Committee. The Board assessed evidence, cross-verified claims, and consulted legal precedents to ensure that decisions were fair, transparent, and legally sound.

The action taken by NBEMS reflects a broader trend in Indian medical education of holding candidates accountable and maintaining strict ethical standards for postgraduate examinations.

Key Takeaways for Future NEET PG Aspirants

  1. Integrity Matters: Any attempt at malpractice can lead to annulment of results, legal consequences, and career setbacks.
  2. Use Official Channels: Admissions and counselling should be completed strictly through MCC or NBEMS-authorized channels.
  3. Transparency and Vigilance: Candidates should monitor updates from NBEMS and other authorities to ensure they are following legally sanctioned procedures.
  4. Legal Awareness: Being aware of petitions, court rulings, and official notifications can help aspirants avoid inadvertently using invalid or unlawful results.

The 2025 NEET PG annulments serve as a reminder to maintain ethical standards and highlight the NBEMS’ proactive role in enforcing examination ethics.

Moving Forward

While the NEET PG 2025 counselling schedule is pending, the NBEMS decision ensures that only eligible candidates with valid results proceed for admissions. The Board’s firm stance on malpractice demonstrates a zero-tolerance policy and sets a precedent for future examinations.

Candidates are advised to regularly check the NBEMS official website for notifications and updates regarding counselling, question paper releases, and any further instructions. Ensuring compliance with official guidelines is crucial for a smooth admission process and to avoid legal complications.

Conclusion

The cancellation of NEET PG results for 22 candidates by NBEMS underscores the importance of integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in India’s medical education system. With over 2.42 lakh aspirants appearing in the 2025 session alone, the Board’s action reinforces trust in the examination process and ensures that PG medical seats are awarded only to deserving candidates.

This decision also serves as a cautionary tale for future aspirants, highlighting the consequences of malpractice and the need to adhere strictly to official procedures and ethical standards. As the counselling schedule unfolds, it remains crucial for candidates to follow NBEMS and MCC instructions closely to secure their PG admissions legally and transparently.